doogles wrote:
In the risk department, having too much protection is basically paying more than you need to get the job done whereas not having enough means a leak. A leak can have all sorts of follow on effects like embarrassment, soiled clothes, unsanitary conditions, etc.
I usually have a few different levels of protection depending on my situation.

That's what I meant when I wrote "adjust the protection to your current needs"... In fact there are two ways to do this - change more often or use better protection. The challenge is to wight this in a good way. I can talk here for Germany only - but at last for me it was a pretty hard fight to get the protection that I need from the health insurance. In fact - I know many people who are struggling in that fight and live with pure or wrong protection. I did't think or say that these people have no experience with there UIC - but I know that many did't have enough experience with the health system what makes it really hard for them to find and test the available products on the marked.
The reason for this is not that people are too lazy or to stupid - they simply often get the wrong advice. The first time you ask for absorbing products, you are turning to the two leading parties: health insurance companies and care providers: The insurances - are interested in saving money and the care providers are interested in selling the product with the best margin. In the first case you will end up with the cheap leaking model and in the other case you end up with expensive pants that you have to pay by your own and which also tend to leak. None of the "official" channels is interested to find the best solution for you. This is why a forum like this and also support groups are that important - because they are independent.
It's exactly as you say - at the end one important point is is the price tag that rules the decision. How ever there's also an other important point in the calculation - your self-confidence: This is one of the reason way I would encourage every one not only to test a lot of products but also to grow the self-confidence and to face the problem. I'm sure in 99% of the cases no one will care if you visit the toilet with a bag in your hand - and if someone insists you can explain yourself. One of the first things that I did after a couple of horrible month were I try to hide my problem when my UIC started, was to talk with our representatives for employees with disabilities. The result was, that the restrooms in our floor were equipped with bins in the stalls. This was a big advantage for me. Not only because the "dumping" problem was gone - but also because I learned that there is no need to be shy.
I doesn't help much If someone is too shy to change frequently and risk serious skin problems which are often much more problematic to handle than the UIC itself.
But just to bring the discussion back to the starting point - Pants are the most expensive and maybe the worse protection you can buy. It's exactly like sociologygeek already mentioned - a lot of them doesn't work well with the mens anatomy. I personally use Molicare Premium Form extra plus MEN pads and they work fine for me as long as I don't have to sit for a longer time (like in a car or a plane) and as long as I change them regularly. They cost the half of the price of the pants, have compared to a lot of other Hartman products a pretty modern core design and can cope with greater floods but are still very thin and discrete - and: I get them from the health insurance. If I need more protection I use Attends Adjustable. I can get them easy up and down like pants because of the elastics but they can handle ways more than any pant I know - and - very important: I can change them without the need to get out of my cloth.
If you read Bobcoopers post - the I would say this is a classic, that also happened to me. You mentioned that something went wrong (Bob: During the day I discovered that I had a bad day and that my Tena active pant started to fill up quicker than normal") but you did't act. The result is a leaking disaster. One think I learned on the hard way: There is nearly nothing that can justify a delayed change. If it's necessary I will excuse myself - even in an important meeting - but of cause it's better to check beforehand. What brings me back to the first point of my post. The successfull management of incontinence problems is based on two factors: Timing and Logistics

...