Post any comments, remarks, ideas, observations, experiences, concerns or questions here.
Topic locked

Re: diaperedmommy ????

Sat May 14, 2016 7:39 pm

Not sure what that means - please forgive my ignorance and explain it. Thanks.

W.

You "less than" 3 me anyway??? Huh?

Re: diaperedmommy ????

Sat May 14, 2016 9:29 pm

<3
Is like an emoticon, to signal a heart, Wetters.

Re: diaperedmommy ????

Sat May 14, 2016 9:56 pm

A key point here is that Brian clearly felt that the right thing to do was to ask cycling_guy if he wanted to get a pm outlining AB/DL before sending it, but he didn't give me the same option.


This is a very strong point. Thanks for making it.

Noe

Re: diaperedmommy ????

Sat May 14, 2016 11:25 pm

Wetters wrote:Not sure what that means - please forgive my ignorance and explain it. Thanks.

W.

You "less than" 3 me anyway??? Huh?


It was supposed to be a heart, so WE LOVE YOU ANYWAY! :wink:

Re: diaperedmommy ????

Sun May 15, 2016 1:51 am

I don't see any blame going on you at ALL Wetters, all you did was make a CORRECT call on a member who was as fake as a $3 bill, plain and simple! This is NOT a forum to discuss AB/DL stuff, not even a word of it, so I suggest if it is brought up in someones post about it being a part of their life, then they are at the wrong place to discuss incon issues, even if they suffer from it... I for one will be deleting ANY registration attempts I get, as all the mods get them, that have any inkling, smidgeon, or hint of AB/DL user names/ID's... OK, carry on with the weekend peoples, nothing to see here! ;-)

PS... Any Pizza left Porkchop? ;-) Puffy

Re: diaperedmommy ????

Sun May 15, 2016 7:51 am

Wetter,
I see no wrong doing on your behalf. Keep up the good work so we have a safe place to talk. Emotion always run high when you are trying to protect something you believe in.

Re: diaperedmommy ????

Sun May 15, 2016 12:06 pm

Thanks, all.

W.

Re: diaperedmommy ????

Sun May 15, 2016 7:19 pm

Scott902 wrote:
MSUSpartan wrote:OK. Not admin, a moderator (dealing with forum content issues), which falls into squarely into the same category as far as I'm concerned here.

The question then becomes if Brian was addressing the message to wetters the moderator, or wetters the individual. As a moderator, I think you need to be fairly thick skinned either was, but if the message has a harassing tone, it crosses the line regardless of whom it is sent to. I don't know if that's the case or not (not being directly privy to the exchange), but I think it's necessarily a part of the discussion here.



I think Wetter's post, describing a part of the PM, is enough merit.

Wetters wrote:Brian, Please don't pm me again. For purposes of public notice, I didn't request a pm from you, and you didn't do me the courtesy of asking for permission before you did it. I won't buy into your intimidation by privately responding to your pm. FYI, I continue to maintain my stance as to AB/DL content on the ISC forum/website.

Schoppy, I'd like to forward Brian's pm to you (there's stuff in there about how he craves a pacifier and bottle), but I can't figure out how to do that. Can you go into my account and retrieve it? Thanks.

W.



Not to sound argumentative, but it seems that you may have missed parts of the last 3-4 pages, with all the various comments.
Happens to me, too, so not meaning to sound rude or anything.



CONTEXT, because without it anything can be taken out of, well... context. And the whole conversation is -exactly- why I did not post it on the forums too..........

Wetter, Yes I now see I was wrong in contacting you without direct permission first. I mis-took your direct comment to me as FIRST making that contact- to which I replied to you PRIVATELY. In order for me to respond in full I couldn't have done so in this thread without posting what I knew I shouldn't. Don't forget it wasn't me who posted this on the web here.

Scott, I absolutely do agree that nothing abdl should be posted here. I have accepted that, and this is why I have not done so. (in spite of those previously mention "undertones" which is what brought this whole fiasco up in the first place). Yeah, if I did start talking about it openly here, or in any other thread, they yeah I absolutely would deserve being banned. As Wetters mentioned though, private messaging is not on the forums or web site. I stand my by belief that I did not break any written rules. Message-wise it seems I absolutely did break an unwritten rule though, to which I was not previously aware. I am now.

To both of you, I apologize and promise I will not message anyone again without getting their prior approval.

Re: diaperedmommy ????

Mon May 16, 2016 3:49 pm

Puffy Pants wrote:I don't see any blame going on you at ALL Wetters, all you did was make a CORRECT call on a member who was as fake as a $3 bill, plain and simple! This is NOT a forum to discuss AB/DL stuff, not even a word of it, so I suggest if it is brought up in someones post about it being a part of their life, then they are at the wrong place to discuss incon issues, even if they suffer from it... I for one will be deleting ANY registration attempts I get, as all the mods get them, that have any inkling, smidgeon, or hint of AB/DL user names/ID's... OK, carry on with the weekend peoples, nothing to see here! ;-)

PS... Any Pizza left Porkchop? ;-) Puffy


Yeah, plenty of pizza left.....

But as long as they keep the boards free of their kink, does it really matter what they do in their private lives?

Re: diaperedmommy ????

Tue May 17, 2016 12:50 am

What they do in their private lives bothers me none, I just get tired of it appearing on the Forum over and over, it gets old fast, and it should not even be brought up to begin with. Puffy
Topic locked