www.incontinentsupport.org

Support for dealing with incontinence
It is currently Wed May 14, 2025 5:53 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 4:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 3:45 pm
Posts: 1959
Location: North Carolina - Raleigh area
I hope I am not duplicating an old topic, but I just found a 2012 medical study that concluded that the annual cost of bowel incontinence (in 2010) was $4110!

That seems a little high. As I am only bowel incontinent (most of the time), my annual costs are - $1,752 for just diapers and a total of $2,196 when other costs are added in - perhaps another $200 for diaper rash cream, $160 for baby powder, and three PUL plastic pants at $28 each Of course I also have annual costs for replacement enema equipments, Castile soap, absorbent pads, and lubricants or about $610 for a total annual cost of about $2,806.

I was getting by on only two diapers per day when bowel incontinent only, but began to have too much irritation and so upped the daily number to three. That seems to work better.

I realize that many in the group have more serious medical circumstances, so the above estimate would be too low for you, but what are your estimates?

--John


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 7:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 1:29 pm
Posts: 850
Did the study indicate that the stats are an average of National or global numbers?

Wetters


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 7:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 3:45 pm
Posts: 1959
Location: North Carolina - Raleigh area
Wetters, the paper originally was published in Dis Colon Rectum and the figures are from the U.S. based on a sample of only 332 adult patients. The paper notes that few data are available on the economic impact of bowel incontinence in the U.S. What I read is only an abstract as I do not have an account with PubMed.

--John


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 6:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:59 am
Posts: 411
Location: Scotland
Maybe the paper takes into account other things apart from the actual cost of dealing with the ... er ... 'output'. For example, bowel incontinence might mean it was harder to get and keep a job or that a person works less hours. In some cases, people might just stay at home out of fear of the embarrassment factor.

Finally, although bowel incontinence can affect anyone, including the otherwise perfectly fit people, it is more likely in people who have other conditions already, spinal injury, MS, spina bifida etc. the study may take into account the extra cost of carers to assist such people.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 1:47 pm
Posts: 578
I am both bladder, and bowel incon and the of $4,110, for bowel incon does seem very high to me too. If that cost included doc visits just about any figure is possible, but the cost of $4,110, for different products associated with being bowel incon is too high in my opinion.

Just my thoughts.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 3:45 pm
Posts: 1959
Location: North Carolina - Raleigh area
Wheels, good point about the added cost of carers, but I would expect that to raise the cost well above the $4110! Same with the cost of time lost from work in a traditional job. It would not take many absences over the course of a year to raise the cost. Remember, the basic cost of diapers, etc, is also included.

--John


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 8:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 2:27 pm
Posts: 1
has anyone ever heard of paraflush for $259.00? Seems to naturally stimulate a bowel movement so you can stay accident free. There is an instructional video too. Maybe it can help eliminate some of the struggles with incont. :oops:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 6:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 3:45 pm
Posts: 1959
Location: North Carolina - Raleigh area
Paraflush essentially is a modified enema for those with little manual dexterity. It uses an external gallon container filled with warm water and which is manually pressurized by the user. It is administered via a standard enema tip while the user is sitting on the toilet.

The Peristeen system seems more efficient and more effective, although more expensive.

I believe that at least one person in our group is using the Peristeen system.

--John


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 147 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group