vvpete wrote:
From my own rather wide reading online I have come to these conclusions:
1- Someone who is in the business of selling incontinence supplies like diapers, plastic pants etc. online generally isn't doing it because he thinks he's going to make a million bucks or get articles written about him in Forbes or Fortune, but because he perceives a need that he can fulfill and make some money at it.
sure, and there's nothing against that. I wouldn't be surprised though if some of them have made a million bucks though by smart targeting the abdl market niche, because if there's one thing about the products targeted at them it is that they are laughingly overpriced.
vvpete wrote:
2- None of these people are going to limit their market to fetishists only or incontinent people only - at least not if they're good businessmen.
Again, sure. That's how economics works. But there is still a great difference between, at one hand, relentlessly maximising your profit while ignoring all moral considerations; and on the other hand conducting your business in a decent and dignified manner.
I know that most don't give a d*mn, but that doesn't invalidate the point.
There is nothing wrong in trying to earn a living by targeting a handicapped group like people with incontinence. But I find it quite another thing if they milk out that group because they don't defend themselves that easy.
And my point was that I don't particularly like it if those entrepreneurs simply start addressing all their customers as if they were abdl's - just because they don't give a d*mn, it saves them the hassle of considering sensitive issues and *we* don't stand up anyhow because we feel that we shouldn't bite the hand that feeds us, or what?
vvpete wrote:
3- I'd suspect that incontinent people actually use more of these products than fetishists. The reason I believe this is that incontinent people generally wear 24/365, and while fetishists also may, they don't necessarily have to, and many don't. Therefore incontinent people are a larger market than fetishists.
You don't take all factors into account.
First, not all incontinent people use or need protection 24/356. In the case of bedwetting, it can be 8/356 or even less, say 8/120 such as in my case.
Also, there is no mention of the actual number of both groups.
On top of that, I have the idea (though that's also born out of my own experience) that incontinent ppl usually get their things in a local bricks-and-mortar shop, like a pharmacy. The Internet stores that we talk about may very well be created almost uniquely to address a demand that arose in the abdl community. Maybe they just use the word "incontinence" to create an illusion of medical resposibility and respectability. But that's speculation.
But *if* that is the case, incontinent ppl may very well only be a very small minority of their clientele.
vvpete wrote:
4- On the subject of variety, incontinent people and fetishists alike vary in their tastes. Some want lots of variety, some are satisfied with basic white, so to speak. As in most all other areas of life, the differences among us are wide.
True.
Like I said, I dont mind the variety at all. On the contrary, I appreciate it.
I just don't want to be lumped in the same category as abdl's.
Maybe I should give you the example that annoyed me so much.
I want to give disposables a try. That's why I ended up on this forum.
I am quite particular in what I want as far as plastic diaper covers go: I dislike that smooth, shiny vinyl. Not only because it doesn't appeal to me visually, but also because I think it's quite obvious that this smooth material tends to behave like cling-film. I hate that.
There's also a textured variety of PVC that looks and behaves more like regular fabric. But you cannot tell by the low-res pictures that these shops have of their pants.
So I asked. By email. From one store I initially got a friendly answer, though it was from someone who addressed themselves as "mommy". But hey, if they want to, fine. She told me that they indeed had one Gary-type pant that was made of this textured vinyl and thus I ordered one of those. I got my order quite soon and I wrote back to thank her for the prompt processing & sending and mentioned that this was indeed what I'd been looking for.
Her answer to that was very strange and I've been thinking about that ever since. This is what she wrote:
Quote:
They remind me of the old Gerber plastic pants which had a bit of texture.
My baby doesn't like them, partly because they are pink but also because
they remind him of the old Gerber baby pants. Frankly, I find that
extra incentive to put them on him. They really aren't any noisier.
Can you imagine that this made me very upset and angry? What the heck does this balderdash about "her baby" - for crying out loud! - has got to do with a polite thank-you note?
I haven't replied to it, though my fingers are itching to do so.