As I quoted earlier they also claim
Quote:
Our dermatological accreditation starts with a scientific review performed by our team of independent dermatologists. This is a professional analysis of a product’s research including a thorough assessment of the ingredients, clinical trials data and proof of efficacy. Once accreditation is awarded we then implement an annual licensing agreement.
In the end, it is agreed that their goal is definitely geared towards "Giving consumers confidence in their buying choices with the reassurance that products have been independently verified as skin safe."
I don't see this being useful to me. I was curious to understand why (NA) TENA Super was being sold as TENA Super and as TENA ProSkin Super. As far as I can tell, it's just timing: earlier packaged product vs current product with accreditation.